Powered by Blogger.
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Google Consumer Surveys for Market Research and Website Satisfaction

Google now offers Google Consumer Surveys for Market Research and Website Owners. I’m not a huge proponent of companies developing their own surveys, it’s quite an undertaking for customer intelligence companies who research and develop strategies to capture accurate information. Someone plopping a couple questions on a form risks pushing their business in the wrong direction simply because of the manner they ask and acquire responses. Be careful.
Google Consumer Surveys is a fast, affordable, and accurate market research tool that helps you make informed business decisions by asking internet users survey questions. Users complete survey questions in order to access high-quality content around the web, and content publishers get paid as their users answer. Google automatically aggregates and analyzes responses through a simple online interface.
For Website Owners – A free satisfaction survey is placed directly on your website so you can get feedback right when it’s top of mind. To use the satisfaction survey, just copy and paste the code snippet into the page where you want to survey your users. They provide a monthly satisfaction tracker for free, and you can customize questions for just 1 cent per response.
For Market Research – Create surveys in minutes and access near instant Google-powered reports, charts, and insights. Get statistically significant, valid results at scale from real people, not biased panels.
  1. You create online surveys to gain consumer insight.
  2. People complete questions in order to access premium content.
  3. Publishers get paid as their visitors answer.
  4. You get nicely aggregated and analyzed data.
  5. You can also track the responses biweekly or monthly for trend analysis.
Pricing: Target a representative sample of the U.S., Canada, or UK Internet population for $0.10 per response or $150.00 for 1500 responses (recommended for statistical significance). If you’d like to segment the sample demographically, it’s $0.50 per response.



Don’t Forget To Export Your Google Reader Data Today


After withering in the dry heat for the last four months, Google Reader will quietly disappear into the horizon later today. It’s a sad day, but the sun will rise tomorrow, and the Internet will keep on spinning. Thankfully there are a lot of fine Google Reader alternatives to keep feeding your RSS addiction.
For the past month, a daily popup has reminded Google Reader users to back up their data. Google is essentially zero’n the drive tomorrow, ridding itself of millions of OMPL files. Stop procrastinating and take 5 minutes to export your data.
There are several options.
Google Takeout is by far the easiest way to export your Google Reader data. The Google service is designed to export not only Google Reader data, but also data from Buzz, Hangouts, Contacts, Drive, Goggles, and YouTube. If you just choose Reader, the export file should be less than a megabyte and only take a minute or so to process and download. Once downloaded, this OMPL file can be used in most RSS readers.
If you choose all of the services, the process will take a lot longer, but Google Takeout will email you when the exported data is ready to be downloaded.
However, Google Takeout doesn’t export all of your Reader information. As Mihai Parparita explainsthrough his persistent.info site, it leaves behind tagged items, comments, and read items. He created this tool to export everything through Reader’s API.
It grabs:
  • All your read items
  • All your starred items
  • All your tagged items
  • All your shared items
  • All the shared items from the people you were following.
  • All the comments on shared items
  • All your liked items
  • All items you’ve kept unread, emailed, read on your phone, clicked on or otherwise interacted with.
  • All items that have appeared in one of your subscriptions
  • All items that were recommended to you
  • All items in the (English) “Explore” section
  • All the profiles of the people you were following before the sharepocalypse.
  • All your preferences.
The tool takes a bit of command line work, but if your Reader data is precious, it’s worth the time and effort. The step-by-step instructions are here.

Source: TechCrunch

Google Says Government Surveillance Growing


Demands for Google user data and content take-downs are on the rise, some of which are not legitimate.

This may not come as a shock at a time when an FBI investigation into confrontational email messages between two women uncovered a tangentially related extramarital affair, forcing the resignation of the nation's director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

[ What can the former CIA director's experience with Gmail teach you about securing your communications? SeePetraeus Fallout: 5 Gmail Security Facts. ]Indeed, it reprises what Google has said in previous government Transparency Reports: Governments want more data about Google users and want more content posted by Google users removed. In June, Google characterized the rise in politically motivated content takedown requests as "troubling."

In a blog post, Google senior policy analyst Dorothy Chou says, "[G]overnment demands for user data have increased steadily since we first launched the Transparency Report." In the first half of 2012, the period covered in the report, Chou says there were 20,938 inquiries from government organizations for information about 34,614 Google-related accounts.
Google has a long history of pushing back against governmental demands for data, going back at least to its refusal to turn over search data to the Department of Justice in 2005.
Many other companies have chosen to cooperate with government requests rather than question or oppose them, but Chou notes that in the past year, companies like Dropbox, LinkedIn, Sonic.net and Twitter have begun making government information requests public, to inform the discussion about Internet freedom and its limits.
According to the report, the U.S. continues to make the most requests for user data, 7,969 in the first six months of the year. Google complied with 90% of these requests. Google's average compliance rate for the 31 countries listed in the report is about 47%.
Interestingly, Google's overall rate of compliance with government takedown requests has declined in the past two years. This appears to reflect a rise in frivolous or illegitimate takedown requests. As Google notes in its FAQs, it has received a number of fake court orders directing the company to remove content from its search index or websites.
Google continues to enhance the way it presents information in its Transparency Reports. It has just added new bar graphs that illustrate content removal trends over time, translated the Transparency Report into 40 languages and expanded its FAQs. 

November 13, 2012 03:09 PM

Largest Snowflake Ever Observed in Google Doodle


The largest snowflake ever observed in the world supposedly appeared 125 years ago today in Fort Keogh, Montana. A Google Doodle today prominently features a giant snowflake and leads searchers to discover more about this Guinness World record.
google-doodle-largest-snowflake
The Doodle features a cow grazing in snow-covered ground. Over a few seconds, the giant snowflake descends, sending birds flying to avoid being crushed, and slightly drawing the interest of the cow once the flake lands, shaking the animated logo. The snowflake become the second “o” in Google’s logo, joining a leafless tree as the “G” and a tower which substitutes for the “l”.
largest-snowflake-ever-google-doodle
The world’s largest snowflake was reportedly 15 inches wide and 8 inches thick. However, this record seems to be based on the word of a ranch owner named Matt Coleman, who described the snowflake as “larger than milk pans” to the Monthly Weather Review journal – perhaps the reason the cow was included in Google’s Doodle, according to USA Today.
This record seems a bit dubious, as the National Snow & Ice Data Center notes in its FAQ on how big snowflakes can get:
“Snowflakes are agglomerates of many snow crystals. Most snowflakes are less than one-half inch across. Under certain conditions, usually requiring near-freezing temperatures, light winds, and unstable, convective atmospheric conditions, much larger and irregular flakes close to two inches across in the longest dimension can form. No routine measure of snowflake dimensions are taken, so the exact answer is not known.”
Sadly, searching the Guinness World Records website brings up no additional information about this record, as a search on the site for “snowflake” returns 1 result, but for the “rarest gorilla” named Little Snowflake.
Celebrating a record snowflake seems like the next logical step for Google, after in December adding a special Easter Egg for “let it snow” searches that has since been disabled. However, Google’s recognition of this record is reminiscent of Google celebrating the 119th anniversary of the first documented ice cream sundae, which was surprisingly controversial, considering two towns claimed to have invented the tasty dessert.
Google generally celebrates holidays and the birthdays of noteworthy figures, such as the recent Doodles for Nicolas Steno and Charles Addams. Google also recently censored its logo to protest controversial anti-piracy bills.
Source: 

Google’s Call to Action: Tell Congress to Vote NO on # SOPA


google-blacks-out-logo-sopa-protest
To call attention to two bills that would result in massive web censorship and hurt American businesses, Google today has carried through on its promise to protest the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) by blacking out its logo and urging a call to action.
The typical primary colors you’re used to seeing on Google are gone today. Instead, Google users are greeted with the above image and a message: “Tell Congress: Please don’t censor the web!
Whether you click on the blacked out image or the link beneath it, you’ll end up at a Google website, End Piracy, Not Liberty, where Google lays out the numerous reasons millions of Americans oppose the controversial bills and you can sign a petition opposing SOPA/PIPA.
“Two bills before Congress, known as the Protect IP Act (PIPA) in the Senate and the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the House, would censor the Web and impose harmful regulations on American business. Millions of Internet users and entrepreneurs already oppose SOPA and PIPA,” the site reads in part. “The Senate will begin voting on January 24th. Please let them know how you feel. Sign this petition urging Congress to vote NO on PIPA and SOPA before it is too late.”
Google says fighting piracy is important, but “the most effective way to shut down pirate websites is through targeted legislation that cuts off their funding. There’s no need to make American social networks, blogs and search engines censor the Internet or undermine the existing laws that have enabled the Web to thrive, creating millions of U.S. jobs.”
The only other search engine joining with a visual protest is DuckDuckGo, which puts a black bar over the face of their trademark duck with a link for users: STOP PIPA/SOPA, which leads to Grassroutes and tells you, based on your IP address, how to contact representatives via email, Facebook, and Twitter.
duckduckgo-stop-sopa-pipa
Bing’s homepage hasn’t done anything special today to show opposition to SOPA, though Microsoft said the company opposes SOPA in a statement:
“We oppose the passage of the SOPA bill as currently drafted, but hundreds of millions of customers rely on our services every day so we don’t plan to shut those down to express our view. This is an important issue and we think the recent White House statement points in a constructive way to problems with the current legislation, the need to fix them, and the opportunity for people on all sides to talk together about a better path forward.”
Yahoo also isn’t among those protesting, though Yahoo-owned Flickr is allowing users to black out their own photos in symbolic protest.
Google yesterday announced they would dedicate their homepage to the cause. In fact, if you Google “SOPA,” you’ll find a million different reasons SOPA supporters want time to let things cool off, as the online reaction against their bill has been overwhelming.

SOPA Becomes a Waiting Game - Markup to Continue in February

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) announced late Tuesday that he expects committee markup on the controversial SOPA to continue in February, citing political party retreats as the reason for the delay.
The move bought Smith a comfortable cushion between the Internet blackout planned for today by major sites including Wikipedia, Reddit, WordPress, Mozilla, BoingBoing, and Cheezburger, and the next round of debating a bill condemned by pretty much everyone outside of the entertainment industry.
In a White House press release, Smith said:
"To enact legislation that protects consumers, businesses and jobs from foreign thieves who steal America's intellectual property, we will continue to bring together industry representatives and Members to find ways to combat online piracy.
“Due to the Republican and Democratic retreats taking place over the next two weeks, markup of the Stop Online Piracy Act is expected to resume in February.
“I am committed to continuing to work with my colleagues in the House and Senate to send a bipartisan bill to the White House that saves American jobs and protects intellectual property."
For an easily digestible, comprehensive SOPA overview, check out Mashable’s "Why SOPA is Dangerous". Visit Stop American Censorship to sign their petition and find out what else you can do to protest SOPA/PIPA or whatever the great minds in Hollywood Washington come up with next.
Enjoy the retreat, guys, the Internet will still be here when you deign to return and debate the bill you’re determined to pass, come hell or high water.
Source: 

Google Defends Privacy Changes as Questions Mount


Following a flurry of criticism over its privacy policy revamp, Google is attempting to clear up misconceptions about its actions.

Users still have control over what information Google sees; Google is not collecting any more data about users than it has in the past; and users can use as much or as little as they want of Google, Google Policy Manager Betsy Masiello declares in a company blog on Thursday.
She explains that a number of Google services -- search, maps, and YouTube, for example -- can be used without persons identifying themselves through a login. For services that require logins, a number of tools and options are available to reduce the data being collected by Google.
Google isn't collecting more data from its users under the new policy, Masiello maintains. "Our new policy simply makes it clear that we use data to refine and improve your experience on Google—whichever products or services you use," she writes. "This is something we have already been doing for a long time."
"We’re making things simpler and we’re trying to be upfront about it," she adds. "Period."
Not everyone buys Google's "simpler" line. In the U.S. Congress, for example, leading privacy advocates in both the House and Senate have vowed to take a closer look at the impact of the policy changes on consumer privacy.
Google was also initially rapped by an independent watchdog of the federal cloud, SafeGov.org, for creating privacy risks for government workers with the new policies. Google quickly responded that the new policies do not apply to government workers using Google Apps. That, though, raised the question that if the policies could put the privacy of government workers at risk, then might they also put the privacy of rank-and-file users at risk as well?One of those advocates went even further. Rep. Ed Markey (D-Massachusetts) has called on U.S. Federal Trade Commission to investigate whether the policy changes violate Google's privacy agreementmade with the FTC earlier this year.
While Google is touting its policy changes as a good thing for users, others argue that the real beneficiaries of the move are advertisers. By consolidating information about its users and refining target audiences for a product, Google can charge more for its advertising, argue critics of the policy.
Moreover, some contend that Google is so blinded by its thirst for advertising revenue that it's hurting its reason for being: search. In a recent filing with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission, for example, Google notes "After all, ads are just more answers to users’ queries." That suggests to some that the Google can’t tell the difference between good search results and spamny ads any more.

Source:  John P. Mello Jr.PCWorld  

How Google Keeps Your Secrets Private


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- How does a company that collects so much information from its users keep all that data private?

Meet Alma Whitten, Google's director of privacy.

At the end of a miserable 2010 filled with privacy blunders including thedisastrous Google Buzz fiasco, Google appointed Whitten to the position of privacy director. Since then, Whitten has instituted what she calls a "culture of privacy" at the company. So far it has been paying off.

Over the course of the past year, Google (GOOG, Fortune 500) has released new privacy tools, put in place a multifaceted structure to ensure users' privacy, and built in fail-safes to make sure nothing falls between the cracks.

"We've made incredible progress on this over the past year," said Whitten in an interview with CNNMoney that took place last month. "We've built the car, and now we're just doing the tune-up.

"As part of that tune-up, Google on Tuesday made the major announcement that it has streamlined its privacy policy. Instead of 70 policies across each of its products -- search, maps, Gmail, etc. -- Google will consolidate most of them into a single, shorter, privacy agreement. Whitten wrote in a blog post Tuesday that the move is designed to add clarity to Google's privacy stance.

Google has begun notifying its users of the changes. The company also began a massive publicity campaign this month, putting advertisements about privacy in major cities throughout the country.

The company is ramping up its privacy initiative as the Federal Trade Commission is keeping a watchful eye on the search giant. Last March, Google agreed to submit an independent privacy review to the government for the next 20 years after the company inadvertently revealed some users' e-mail contact lists to the public in its February 2010 release of the Buzz social network.

That was a turning point for the company. Still reeling from the Buzz nightmare, the company in October 2010 hired Whitten -- an engineer -- to head up its new privacy initiative.It appeared to be a curious choice at first. But Whitten's roots as an in-the-trenches software nerd allowed her to change Google's privacy approach for the better.

Forming a privacy culture

Prior to Whitten's appointment as director of privacy, Google had a "privacy review" for each new product. Whitten described that review as "a cacophony, rather than a harmonized message that delivered strong guidance.

"In its place, Whitten created an internal structure called the Privacy Working Group. Google hired people with expertise in specific areas of privacy like data anonymization, location awareness, and advertising. The company then put those experts into sub-groups.





Google's Mayer: Don't be afraid of us

When a new product comes along, the subgroups analyze the products and determine things that the engineers may have missed, such as whether a user's location data is sufficiently separated from data that goes to advertisers.

The company also put in place several fail-safes to ensure that privacy decisions are never made by just one person.

"We don't want to have a situation where a decision is being made about something sensitive, where someone thinks the code is doing one thing, but it's actually doing something else," Whitten told CNNMoney..

As a result, Google now makes engineers go deep down into each new product's code to verify the Privacy Working Group experts' understanding of the code before a decision is made.

Whitten says her most important achievement, however, has been building privacy into Google's culture.

One way Google achieved that was by linking privacy to staff evaluations. When Googlers are up for promotions, one factor that's weighed is whether they ingrained privacy into their products and effectively used the Privacy Working Group.

Whitten said the initiative has been a success, and many Googlers have felt empowered by the changes she has instituted. Privacy is no longer a burden to Google's staff, she said. Instead, Google engineers view getting privacy right as business-critical.

As Google's products begin to flow into one another, getting privacy right will be a crucial task going forward. Search Plus Your World, Google's new search tool that displays social network information in search results, has already raised some eyebrows.

"Our users are our biggest business asset; that's the No. 1 thing that we can't screw up," Whitten said. "That's why making sure Google has a really good privacy process helps me sleep at night."